Visualizations : Health Care Lie: '47 Million Uninsured Americans' (A Lie that Promotes Big Government)

Can't see the visualization? Download the latest Java plugin here. On Macs: best viewed in Safari.

Created by: cgreen Created on: Monday September 24, 4:23 PM

Data file: Health Care Lie: '47 Million Uninsured Americans' (A Lie that Promotes Big Government)

Data source: Census Bureau, Dr. David Gratzer, The Kaiser Family Foundation, a liberal non-profit

This data set
has 2 negative ratings

| cancel

	If you "watch" a visualization or dataset, you'll be notified of new comments on your watchlist page. Please log in to "watch" this.	Clicking this icon will let you add this to one of your hubs. This is a good way to organize a set of visualizations or datasets on a particular topic or theme. You need to be logged in and be a member of at least one topic hub to be able to add visualizations and data sets to topic hubs.	Give this a thumbs-up or thumbs-down. Please login to rate this.
		Please wait...

This visualization
has 1 positive and 2 negative ratings

Part of these topic hubs:

Health

Poverty

Taxes

The 2008 presidential campaigns

Want to keep track of this visualization?

Learn more:

About the Bar Chart

Comments (5)

cgreen says:

Health Care Lie: '47 Million Uninsured Americans (A Lie that Promotes Big Government)

Michael Moore, politicians and the media use inflated numbers of those without health insurance to promote universal coverage.
http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2007/20070718153509.aspx

By Julia A. Seymour
Business & Media Institute
7/18/2007 4:01:33 PM

Michael Moore was wrong about health insurance.
So were President Bush, Sens. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.), presidential candidates former Sen. John Edwards and Gov. Mike Huckabee and The Washington Post, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, People magazine and Time magazine, as well as CNN, CBS and ABC.

Each of these people and media outlets incorrectly claimed the number of uninsured to be 40 to 50 million Americans. The actual total is open to debate. But there are millions of people who should be excluded from that tally, including: those who aren’t American citizens, people who can afford their own insurance, and people who already qualify for government coverage but haven’t signed up.
Government statistics also show 45 percent of those without insurance will have insurance again within four months after job transitions.

http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2007/20070718153509.aspx

Posted Monday September 24, 4:23 PM
see view for this comment

Anonymous says:

This graphic is crummy. It is not readily apparent that the creator intended for bars 3 through 8 (from left to right) to add up to bar 2 which is a significant fraction of bar 1 (or at least that is what I think is supposed to happen). You really only need one bar which is sectioned off into the various "lie" segments.
And another thing: data should speak for itself. If you have to write "lie" in parentheses beside each relevant bar, then the graphic will never come across as a statistical display of reality. It will instead come off as an unscientific, jumble of not impartial, qualitative assessments (which this appears to be).

Posted Wednesday October 03, 5:05 PM

Anonymous says:

You would think so. But, some people are so brainwashed by the liberal mainstream media, that it doesn't hurt to add the (lie) to the bars that are lies. Also, if you think the graph is crummy, please improve it. Don't just complain.

Posted Monday October 22, 10:55 PM
see view for this comment

augustinian says:

This is political hackery, not serious data analysis. The creator appears to have little familiarity with Census survey methods, health insurance issues, or social science. The Census research is performed by serious researchers. If someone has a quarrel with their methods, then be specific.

The claim seems to be that if families don't spend their money as right-wing hacks think they should, then they don't count. How arrogant.

Posted Thursday November 01, 3:10 PM

Anonymous says:

I don't think there's a problem including all of those categories when you talk about the number of insured Americans.

What does it mean to be "able" to afford health care and "choose" not to have it? I currently don't have health care but I might be able to afford it in theory. However, I'm healthy and only 23, and don't have much money. You could say I am "choosing" to be uninsured but considering how expensive it is, I haven't done that. I have instead "chosen" to take the risk. This isn't actually good for me though, because if I get seriously sick, I won't really be able to afford to pay for my health care. Also, I can't currently afford to see a dentist. By the way, I just graduated from MIT and now work on campus doing research, so it's not like I am not skilled or don't work hard. I just don't make enough to have $400 a month to spare on a very risky gamble.

The reason insurance works is that it spreads the risk for everyone. If we had a national health service it would spread that risk even more and reduce the burden on any individual. Bureaucracy costs would be decreased by having one system for everyone. We would also save money by reducing emergency room costs with better preventative care. It would be more humane and more efficient to provide national health care services to everyone.

Posted Sunday December 16, 12:25 AM
see view for this comment

Visualizations : Health Care Lie: '47 Million Uninsured Americans' (A Lie that Promotes Big Government)

Part of these topic hubs:

Learn more:

Comments (5)

Post a comment as Anonymous [Sign in using alphaWorks ID]