Visualizations : Go to the red depts

Creator: Jiang
Tags:

Dataset Data file: Which Dept. Should You Go Data source: Michigan Not_rated_big This data set
has not yet been rated
Full_image Share_this Watch_this_disabled Add_to_topic_hub_disabled Rate_this_disabled

Rated_up_big This visualization has 1 positive and 0 negative ratings.

Gray_megaphone_small Part of these topic hubs

Gray_binoculars_small Being watched by

Comments (6)

currently showing
Jiang saved this snapshot
Posted Friday September 14 2007, 12:58 AM
see view for this comment
Jiang says:

This one may be right.
But the dentists are still not highly paid…maybe due to they have other titles in practice which makes more money:)

Posted Friday September 14 2007, 01:01 AM
see view for this comment

Thanks for the update! This view is very interesting, and I wonder how it compares to other schools. The business faculty earns a lot, but the lawyers still beat them by a mile…

The allergists and dentistry folks, who earn very little, are in small departments. Could these be new areas, and the faculty more junior? I wonder if there are stats on average ages…

Posted Friday September 14 2007, 08:59 AM
see view for this comment
ladamic says:

Hi Martin,
We’d have to find other state schools that are required to post this kind of information (UofM has to, which is why we are using it for the class).
Actually, I have a question about constructing an effective treemap here. Should we have a blank instead of a ‘-’ column for departments that have no subdepartment? I was hoping the students could create something that has internal medicine and pediatrics nested within medicine, but visualizing the subdepartments as the highest level of detail then leaves just ‘-’ for the departments that have none. Thanks! Lada

Posted Friday September 14 2007, 10:10 AM

Hi Lada,

Yep, a blank column is OK. The tricky thing is that it should go in the middle—the labels always come from the last column. This started as a feature, but maybe it’s more like a bug :-) I switched the columns around and uploaded a new data set, and you can see the result here by clickingon this image… let me know if I’ve misinterpreted your question, though!

ladamic says:

Thanks Martin, that is just the thing that it needed. Another treemap visualization I’ve used before (http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/treemap/) has an optional number of nested categories at the end of each line, e.g.
school1
school2 dept2 subdept2
school3 dept3

and I think this allows it to figure out what label to use.

This led me astray in trying to use subcategories here as well. In any case, thanks much for helping us out! This is exactly the visualization we were after.
(I also tried uploading a dataset that set the subdepartment column to the department column for those entries that had no subdepartments, but this resulted in duplicate cells…)

Posted Saturday September 15 2007, 12:32 PM

Post a comment as Anonymous

include snapshot of visualization?
Snapshot_included

Please verify that you are human

simple_captcha.jpg
(type the code from the image)