many eyes many eyes
Can't delete this data set? That's because it has either visualizations or comments attached to it.
Can't delete this? That's because it has comments attached to it.
Sign in
  • explore
    • visualizations
    • data sets
    • comments
    • topic hubs
  • participate
    • register
    • create visualization
    • upload data set
    • create topic hub
  • learn more
    • quick start
    • visualization types
    • data format & style
    • about Many Eyes
    • FAQ
    • blog
  • contact
    • contact us
    • report a bug
  • legal
    • terms of use

Visualizations : Candidates for the UK House of Commons, 1950-1970, by Party and Occupation, v. 2

Can't see the visualization? Download the latest Java plugin here. On Macs: best viewed in Safari.

Created by: pick      Created on: Monday January 14, 3:39 PM

dataset icon Data file: Candidates for the UK House of Commons, 1950-1970, by Party and Occupation, v. 2
Data source: Original dataset extracted from the Times House of Commons series
This data set
has not yet been rated.
share this help
Share live visualization
Live visualization - to embed this visualization on your site, simply copy & paste:

Size:
Share static thumbnail
Static image - to embed an image of this visualization on your site, simply copy & paste:

Email link to visualization
Email link to visualization
close
Clicking the "blog this" button generates a snippet of html that you can copy and paste to your blog to share this visualization with your readers.
Positive rating Positive
Negative rating Negative
cancel

save | cancel
share this Watch This
If you "watch" a visualization or dataset, you'll be notified of new comments on your watchlist page.
Please log in to "watch" this.
Rate This
Clicking this icon will let you add this to one of your hubs. This is a good way to organize a set of visualizations or datasets on a particular topic or theme.
You need to be logged in and be a member of at least one topic hub to be able to add visualizations and data sets to topic hubs.
Rate This
Give this a thumbs-up or thumbs-down.
Please login to rate this.
workingPlease wait...
This visualization
has not yet been rated.
topic hubs
You can add this visualization to a topic hub!
Learn more.
topic hubs
Want to keep track of this visualization?
Add it to your watchlist!
Clicking on will let you be notified of changes to this item on your watchlist page (for example: you�ll get notified about new comments, new visualizations, etc).
If you've joined any topic hubs, clicking on will let you add the visualization to one of our hubs.
Topic hubs are a good way to organize a set of visualizations on a particular topic or theme.

Learn more:

Treemap About the Treemap

Comments (2)


pick says:
A key shortcoming of this dataset is that so many of the candidates do not have an occupation coded. (This is because the short bios we used to code the candidate characteristics often don't list an occupation, or the occupation doesn't fall into a category we code for, or the text we parse to code the occupation is garbled.) This visualization shows that -- more than a quarter of candidates are not coded.

We also see that the oldest categories of MPs are miners and trade union organizers, who represent the Labour old guard. Need to determine to what extent this indicates changing demographics of the Labour party (ie, we already see the rise of a new guard not made up of miners and unionists) and to what extent this merely indicates that the miners and unionists were career politicians in safe Labour districts, pretty much immune from young challengers.
Posted Monday January 14, 3:46 PM
Last edited Monday January 14, 4:06 PM
see view for this comment
pick says:
The most successful candidates on average were miners and trade unionists for Labour; these candidates stood for office in districts that were solidly Labour and basically unbeatable.
Posted Monday January 14, 4:01 PM
see view for this comment

Post a comment as Anonymous [Sign in using alphaWorks ID]

Include snapshot of visualization?

snapshot included

You've got something that might be a URL in your entry. That means we need to make sure that you're not a spambot. Nothing personal!

>


Please follow our terms of use.