many eyes many eyes
Can't delete this data set? That's because it has either visualizations or comments attached to it.
Can't delete this? That's because it has comments attached to it.
Sign in
  • explore
    • visualizations
    • data sets
    • comments
    • topic hubs
  • participate
    • register
    • create visualization
    • upload data set
    • create topic hub
  • learn more
    • quick start
    • visualization types
    • data format & style
    • about Many Eyes
    • FAQ
    • blog
  • contact
    • contact us
    • report a bug
  • legal
    • terms of use

Visualizations : CO2 Emissions in 2003 (kt)

Can't see the visualization? Download the latest Java plugin here. On Macs: best viewed in Safari.

Created by: Anonymous      Created on: Tuesday March 27, 12:23 PM

dataset icon Data file: CO2 Emissions Compared To Land Area
Data source: Many Eyes, NationMaster.com
This data set
has not yet been rated.
share this help
Share live visualization
Live visualization - to embed this visualization on your site, simply copy & paste:

Size:
Share static thumbnail
Static image - to embed an image of this visualization on your site, simply copy & paste:

Email link to visualization
Email link to visualization
close
Clicking the "blog this" button generates a snippet of html that you can copy and paste to your blog to share this visualization with your readers.
Positive rating Positive
Negative rating Negative
cancel

save | cancel
share this Watch This
If you "watch" a visualization or dataset, you'll be notified of new comments on your watchlist page.
Please log in to "watch" this.
Rate This
Clicking this icon will let you add this to one of your hubs. This is a good way to organize a set of visualizations or datasets on a particular topic or theme.
You need to be logged in and be a member of at least one topic hub to be able to add visualizations and data sets to topic hubs.
Rate This
Give this a thumbs-up or thumbs-down.
Please login to rate this.
workingPlease wait...
This visualization
has not yet been rated.
topic hubs
You can add this visualization to a topic hub!
Learn more.
topic hubs
Want to keep track of this visualization?
Add it to your watchlist!
Clicking on will let you be notified of changes to this item on your watchlist page (for example: you�ll get notified about new comments, new visualizations, etc).
If you've joined any topic hubs, clicking on will let you add the visualization to one of our hubs.
Topic hubs are a good way to organize a set of visualizations on a particular topic or theme.

Learn more:

Bubble Chart About the Bubble Chart

Comments (6)


Anonymous says:
Emissions per capita would be more interesting.
Posted Friday March 30, 4:11 AM
Anonymous says:
Wonder how this compares to energy use, population, average income? Maybe per capita energy use vs. average income? Or per capita oil use vs. income? Per capita CO2 emissions vs. per capita protein intake? Point being: is there a correlation between standard of living and energy use? Purpose: demonstrate that increasing energy availability (preferably non-CO2-based) increases standard of living, if true.
Posted Friday March 30, 2:55 PM
see view for this comment
Anonymous says:
and why do I believe this is true? its not like there is a CO2 monitor above the earth, logging the emmissions. THis all depends on the politics behind the author and to what gain/loss they want to derive.
Posted Friday March 30, 4:06 PM
Anonymous says:
Can you put Euro in one circle in another version of this map?
Posted Tuesday April 03, 2:05 AM
see view for this comment
Anonymous says:
Is the large scale burning of forests considered in this graph? I think: no. Contributions of brazil and indonesia would look much different.
Posted Tuesday April 03, 6:13 AM
see view for this comment
Anonymous says:
If one switches to a bubble view based on CO2/area then the political division issue of EU vs countries disappears. It certainly is a very different view. I think per capita and per GDP would also be very interesting. Of course one needs to remember that issues like which countries are blessed with lots of hydro or which are willing to accept nuclear also make a big difference.

What about following the flow of international trade? If a country produces goods, services, food, metals, etc for export how would this look if the CO2 used to produce these things was attached to the country consuming rather than producing the product. For instance, American agriculture produces a lot of CO2, but a lot of the food is sent overseas.

I suppose all of this is touching upon some of the numerous reasons that coming up with a global system of CO2 reduction that is perceived as "fair" is so difficult.
Posted Wednesday April 11, 2:16 PM
see view for this comment

Post a comment as Anonymous [Sign in using alphaWorks ID]

Include snapshot of visualization?

snapshot included

You've got something that might be a URL in your entry. That means we need to make sure that you're not a spambot. Nothing personal!

>


Please follow our terms of use.